The study was carried out by a team of archaeologists, geologists and botanists.
This confirms that people lived in the upper layer of the site - Monte Verde II - more than 1,000 years earlier than any other reliably dated human settlement in the Americas.
These dates disagreed with other archaeological evidence for when North America was first settled.
Most scholars now believe that people first crossed the Bering land bridge more than 17,000 years ago.
But evidence to support this coastal migration theory has been hard to find.
The peopling of the Americas may not have been the blitzkrieg movement to the south that people have presumed, but a much slower and more deliberate process.
Scroll down to the video near the foot of this page. Watch it and decide on one thing you would enjoy about being an archaeologist and one thing you would hate.
Take a look at these definitions of archaeology and choose the one you like best. Explain why.
It's difficult to find out how old something is. Radiocarbon dating (sounds like this, but isn't) is one of the best ways, but it doesn't work with everything. Find out what kind of object it works with and give a simple explanation. (Take a look here, here and here.)
They certainly did. Some people think of science as a big bunch of facts. But deciding what the facts are can be hard. Scientists get passionate about this. Take a look at what Fiedel and Dillehay said about each other, when the age of Monte Verde hadn't been settled for sure. Find six words that suggest very strong feelings.
This is a hypothesis. What evidence is there for it already? Have a think and a discussion with your colleagues and suggest how the scientists might get further evidence that would support the hypothesis or prove it wrong.
8 May 2008
The remains of a dozen huts in a peat bog south of Santiago have provided new evidence of the earliest human settlement in the Americas. This supports the theory that humans migrated south along the Pacific Coast more than 14,000 years ago.
The study was carried out by a team of archaeologists, geologists and botanists headed by Vanderbilt University’s Tom Dillehay. It was reported in the May 9 issue of the journal Science.
The paper contains the first new data reported from Monte Verde in 10 years. It includes the identification of nine species of seaweed and marine algae. These were recovered from hearths and other areas in the ancient settlement.
The seaweed samples were dated between 14,220 to 13,980 years ago. This confirms that people lived in the upper layer of the site - Monte Verde II - more than 1,000 years earlier than any other reliably dated human settlement in the Americas.
The Monte Verde site was discovered in 1976. It has well-preserved ruins of a small settlement of 20 to 30 people living in a dozen huts along a small creek. A wide variety of foods have been found at the site. These include shellfish, vegetables, nuts, an extinct species of llama and an animal called a gomphothere, which was something like an elephant.
Almost twenty years ago Dillehay and his colleagues first reported that radiocarbon dating of the bones and charcoal found at Monte Verde gave dates more than 14,000 years before the present. This stirred up a major controversy. These dates disagreed with other archaeological evidence for when North America was first settled.
Since at least 1900, the accepted theory had been that human colonisation began at the end of the last Ice Age. This was about 13,000 years ago, when groups of big-game hunters, called the Clovis culture, followed herds from Siberia to Alaska over a land bridge
They crossed the Bering Strait, it was believed, and then gradually spread southward. The Clovis artefacts were all from 13,000 years ago and later. So a much earlier human settlement in southern Chile was hard to fit with this picture.
It wasn’t until 1997 that the puzzle was solved. A group of archaeologists reviewed the evidence, visited the Monte Verde site and unanimously approved the dating.
Most scholars now believe that people first crossed the Bering land bridge more than 17,000 years ago. They then spread quickly down the coast. The general view is that the early immigrants moved south along the shoreline much more easily than they moved inland.
This is because they could find food and resources along the coast that weren't too different from what they were used to. But evidence to support this coastal migration theory has been hard to find. This is because sea levels at the time were about 200 feet lower than today: As the sea level rose, it covered most of the early coastal settlements.
Monte Verde was situated on a small tributary of a large river. It was about 400 feet above sea level, more than 50 miles from the coast. It was 10 miles from a large marine bay. Despite the inland location, the researchers found nine different species of seaweed and algae in the material collected at the site. The Monte Verdeans must have carried this material from the coast and the bay.
The researchers also found a variety of other beach or coastal resources. These included bitumen, flat beach pebbles and water plants from brackish estuaries.
There are other coastal resources at the site, he added. "The Monte Verdeans were really like beachcombers: The number and frequency of these items suggest very frequent contact with the coast, as if they had a tradition of exploiting coastal resources.”
The scientists also found a number of inland resources in the ancient village. These included gomphothere meat. This suggests that the group was moving back and forth between different ecological areas - a process called transhumance.
It takes time to adapt to inland resources and then come back out to the coast, Dillehay says. "The other coastal sites that we have found also show inland contacts."
Perhaps all the early Americans also moved back and forth between inland and coastal areas, he suggests. If so "then the peopling of the Americas may not have been the blitzkrieg movement to the south that people have presumed, but a much slower and more deliberate process.”